Singapore has been labelled by Billy Graham as the Antioch of Asia. Have we lived up to our calling? Syn analyses how local churches and mission agencies can be properly related to each other for greater effectiveness. The recent trend is for Singapore local churches to directly send missionaries to the field and bypass the agencies. Why? Churches nowadays are well-informed about missions and have the funding to carry out work themselves. But is this the best option? Syn interviews many church and agency leaders to get their opinion. It must be stated that he is a director of a mission agency so there is conflict of interest. Since the book contains unnecessarily long-winded interviews, I shall highlight key findings that struck me.
Two key trends in missions:
1. Decrease in the availability of people for long-term missions service.
2. Direct sending by local churches.
…leads to two Symptoms:
1. Singapore missions system lacks cultural intelligence.
2. Missionaries and missions programmes are not venturing to the hard places (Unreached People Groups).
Local churches need to recognise that agencies are specialists in certain mission fields. For example, agencies have cultural intelligence, networks and crisis preparations to assist missionaries on the ground. However, many churches see agencies as competing for their own missionaries. This should not be the case as most pioneer mission work (even in Singapore) were started by agencies first. Think of the London Missionary Society (LMS) that started many Methodist schools in Singapore. The mission agency usually sends missionaries to plant churches in a new place. How can we overcome this break in relationship?
Syn proposes that mission agencies must adapt their roles drastically in order to partner with churches. There are two possible models:
1. Code Sharing Model
Code sharing has been used by the airline industry with great effectiveness. It is a model that finds ways for churches and agencies to share and collaborate without losing their own identity. He highlights the 25 Elements Model as a framework to delegate the responsibilities of a church or agency. The responsibilities are not split in an either-or fashion (church or agency) but differing degrees of responsibility. This allows the local church to remain engaged on many levels.
2. Consultancy Model
The agency has specialised information that the church could tap on: crisis training etc. There is a need for formal consulting service by agency staff much like a consultant in the corporate world. Churches would pay the agency for the cost of their service. Normally, we think that ministry should be freely given but in many parts of the church, there is already fee-for-service! For example, training programmes, Chrsitian entertainers or Christian speakers. Why not missions consulting services.
Syn lists several characteristics of a mission consultant:
- Facilitation skills and the ability to help the church develop their missions vision and programme.
- Some preaching and teaching skills to inspire and impart knowledge.
- An understanding of the needs and workings of the local church.
- Some good missiology and theology of missions to help lay foundations.
- Some strategic thinking skills to help missions committees think through their plans.
- First-hand field experience which would be an advantage to share as a practitioner.
Agencies need a dedicated strategy to priorities consultancy service to churches.
Overall, this book provides a good overview of missions in Singapore and how we as a nation can truly fulfill our calling to be the Antioch of Asia by working together.